#security on software development security and web security, security best practices and discussions, break-ins and countermeasures. Everything you ever wanted to know about software security but were afraid to ask, for fear of not understanding the answer!
That’s one of those people who are continuously making the state of security as miserable as it is today. His propaganda is simple: do not invest into security, it is a total waste of money.
“For most companies it’s going to be far cheaper and serve their customers a lot better if they don’t do anything [about security bugs] until something happens. You’re better off waiting for the market to pressure on you to do it.”
And following the suit was the head of security at Adobe, Brad Arkin, can you believe it? I am not surprised now we have to use things like NoScript to make sure their products do not execute in our browsers. I have a pretty good guess what Adobe and SilverSky are doing: they are covering their asses. They do the minimum required to make sure they cannot be easily sued for negligence and deliberately exposing their customers. But they do not care about you and me, they do not give a damn if their software is full of holes. And they do not deserve to be called anything that has a word ‘security’ in it.
The stuff Brad Arkin is pushing at you flies into the face of the very security best practices we swear by:
“If you’re fixing every little bug, you’re wasting the time you could’ve used to mitigate whole classes of bugs,” he said. “Manual code review is a waste of time. If you think you’re going to make your product better by having a lot of eyeballs look at a lot of code, that’s the worst use of human labor.”
No, sir, you are bullshitting us. Your company does not want to spend the money on security. Your company is greedy. Your company wants to get money from the customers for the software full of bugs and holes. You know this and you are deliberately telling lies to deceive not only the customers but even people who know a thing or two about security. But we have seen this before already and no mistake.
The problem is, many small companies will believe anything that is pronounced at an event like the RSA Conference and take it for granted that this is the ultimate last word in security. And that will make the security state of things even worse. We will have more of those soft underbelly products and companies that practice “security by ignorance”. And we do not want that.
The effect of security bugs can be devastating. The normal human brain is not capable of properly estimating the risks of large magnitude but rare occurrence and tends to downplay them. That’s why the risk of large security problems that can bring a company to its knees is usually discarded. But security problems can be so severe that they will put even a large company out of business, not to mention that a small company would not survive any slightly more than average impact security problem at all.
So, thanks, but no, thanks. Security is a dangerous field, it is commonly compared to a battlefield and there is some truth in that. Stop being greedy and make sure your software does not blow up.